women responsible for preventing (punishing) rape?

June 23, 2010 at 3:14 pm 2 comments

I’ve been reading about this new “anti-rape female condom,”  the Rape Axe.  All I can think of to say so far is, what the fuck?

I understand that rape is an endemic problem that cannot be solved overnight, and that women need ways to protect themselves until (if?) we find ways to end sexual assault.   But how is this a solution?   This device says that rape-prevention becomes the responsibility of would-be victims.

At the most basic level, the Rape Axe doesn’t prevent rape – in order for it to “work” penetration must occur.  Now, let us say men know it exists – do we believe this will end rape?  Last I checked, oral sex and anal sex are also forms of sexual assault that are not prevented by this contraption.   And imagine the actions a rapist may take against a woman who is responsible for jagged hooks latching onto his penis?  Proponents say rapists are already violent – but I can’t but think that such a device might make them more so.

Advocates of the Rape Axe also suggest that the device will tag men, identifying them as rapists, bringing them pain and, potentially, punishment.   Yet I wonder how likely punishment is in a society that somehow produces the following:

  • 1 in  4 men in South Africa said they’ve committed rape
  • 46% said they had committed rape more than once
  • many of these men said they didn’t see anything wrong with doing so

Activists South Africa working to end rape have spoken out against the Rape Axe.  I’m curious to hear more response from the women of South Africa, and what comes of this.  I cannot know what it is like to be a woman facing such bleak circumstances, but my visceral reaction to this device is one of disgust and contempt.  What are your thoughts?

Advertisement

Entry filed under: etc., feminism. Tags: .

roots and wings life’s a garden, dig it.

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. A.Y. Siu  |  June 23, 2010 at 5:05 pm

    Those are all valid criticisms, but there is also another, which is that the Rape Axe device seems to rely on the element of surprise. If it were to come into somewhat common use, rapists could simply (by threat of physical force with a deadly weapon) ask women to remove the Rape Axe device before the assault.

    The whole idea of Rape Axe, though, reminds me of that lame court ruling about how skinny jeans could be removed only with the consent of the rape victim, so it couldn’t really be rape…

    Reply
    • 2. feministhistorynerd  |  June 23, 2010 at 6:09 pm

      I thought of that Italy case as well. Great point about forced removal. Seems there are so many ridiculous, and scary, variables to this thing.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

June 2010
M T W T F S S
« May    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Most Recent Posts


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.